Trump a second term.”įor the wealthy, ideology simply doesn’t exist. But his critics are chiefly motivated by a fear that nominating an avowed socialist would all but ensure Mr. “Some in the party still harbor anger over the 2016 race, when he ran against Hillary Clinton, and his ongoing resistance to becoming a Democrat. Mainstream Democrats are increasingly worried that their effort to defeat President Trump in 2020 could be complicated by Mr. But not to the credulous New York Times, which takes at face value rich donors’ claim to oppose Sanders because they believe he simply can’t defeat Trump: That a network of multi-millionaire and billionaire donors would dislike a candidate who not only rejects their funding, but is actively trying to tax them at rates not seen since 1960, would surely be enough reason to explain why these wealthy elites would want to “stop” his nomination. (The Times reported the same day that 84 percent of Sanders’ donations are less than $200 by contrast, only 37 percent of Kamala Harris’ donations are.)

The New York Times ( 4/16/19) profiled a network of “wealthy liberal donors” who, shockingly, are not fans of Bernie Sanders, who according to the same report has rejected their big-bundler funding and instead opted for small donations. Why does the New York Times take rich liberals at their word that their concern with Bernie Sanders is that he would lose to Trump, rather than the obvious, glaring fact that his election would run counter to their interests? For the New York Times ( 4/16/19), “mainstream Democrats” are found “from canapé-filled fund-raisers on the coasts to the cloakrooms of Washington.”

Dr sanders new york times